r05esArReD
Junior Member
"You just tell me what you want and I?ll be that for you."
Posts: 92
|
Post by r05esArReD on Jun 26, 2004 2:04:22 GMT -5
lol
|
|
Allie
Full Member
No Soup For You!
Posts: 153
|
Post by Allie on Jun 26, 2004 2:19:10 GMT -5
lol 67 we kick ass lol ;D
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 26, 2004 2:20:01 GMT -5
haha -- i need it to be 80+ hah -- i'll be here for a while.
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 26, 2004 2:57:59 GMT -5
ugh - i'm good enoguh 75% good, 1% medeocre and 25% bad is good enough for the night... I can't even see anymore.. it's 3am... ...lol.. no i'm just tired
keep me posted on the progress....hahah
|
|
|
Post by reinhardtchick51 on Jun 26, 2004 11:24:22 GMT -5
i don't think its going to be a problem with people seeing it the movie theater i saw it in in was in the biggest room i saw in at 12:55 and it was almost full so i couldn't even image it at the later shows
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 26, 2004 11:31:00 GMT -5
yeah -- it had really bad ratings until we fixed them...haha
|
|
|
Post by SimplyLuscious on Jun 26, 2004 16:40:18 GMT -5
Wow! Katie and Allie... you guys should win the award for biggest and best fans of The Notebook! ;D I cast my votes. Wow! There are alot of votes for Shrek II. But I like it. Shrek was cute. But I don't see how Dodgeball was good. I watched it and I was dripping off into my dreamland. I guess because I'm a girl and have no interest in comedies-- Shrek is an exception-- that led me to the conclusion that Dodgeball: The True Underdog Story was stupid. And Harry Potter have lots of good ratings, too. Funny thing is I never liked it. I watched it once for an English essay-- no idea why English teacher decided on that-- and I lost interest midway, no! Not even midway. I have to search the net for summary and copy from there.
I think there are others who will cast soon. Hopefully good! [/size]
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 26, 2004 16:42:39 GMT -5
haha -- thanks what can i say -- i love the notebook...haha yeah -- I think people like Dodgeball because of Ben Stiller and Vince Vaughn.. they're pretty funny -- and Shrek 2 is just a fun movie that everoyne wants to see. admit it! hahahah as for Potter... *barfs* I think its' the stupidest thing to ever EVER come out of hollywood -- along with Lord of the Rings...... good god, save me now haha but movie geeks love it and people see it for the special effects.... *rolls eyes*
|
|
|
Post by SimplyLuscious on Jun 26, 2004 16:48:21 GMT -5
Exactly. What's up with LOTR? Journeying to find a ring or something like that. I was like "huh?" Why is everyone all LOTR! *roll eyes, too* Effects is alright, but scenery are better. Like The Notebook. ;D[/size]
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 26, 2004 16:56:03 GMT -5
yeah -- i think ALL special effects should be banned.... anything post-1960 sucks. ;D
|
|
|
Post by SimplyLuscious on Jun 27, 2004 0:15:47 GMT -5
Banned? I think a majority of males would protest againt that, or at least those Matrix-lover kind of people. ;D [/size]
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 27, 2004 0:36:01 GMT -5
haha -- i know -- but I really do believe that. Movies aren't about acting anymore -- well the popular ones anyways.... they're about who can spend the most money on special effects... it's lame.
|
|
|
Post by SimplyLuscious on Jun 27, 2004 0:49:25 GMT -5
Exactly. LOTR have won a bundle of awards because of the special effects. Not just that, but also Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon won numerous awards for their effects. But if compared the two movie, I like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon more. ;D [/size]
|
|
|
Post by LadyKatie on Jun 27, 2004 1:07:48 GMT -5
yeah -- it's sad that there really is a decreasing number of real actors in Hollywood. Now it seems if you can read funny lines, you're in. If you can look dangerous and use a body doulbe all the time, you're in. If you can 'act' in front of a green screen, you're in.
There are hardly any actors who really know how to act and DO so, and not do as the above mention do for more money..
Shame on Hollywood. lol
|
|